Audit Command Language is a very common platform available for firms in the audit industry. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate about whether it is suitable. Since there are many tools available in the market, which can be used for the same tasks as an ‘audit analytics software‘. The debate hinges on the factors like price, return on investment and capability. Essentially, the goal of these debates is to decide the worth of ‘ACL compliance’. Let’s explore these core topics in more detail:
Audit Command Language Vs SQL Server – Pros for SQL Server
SQL server is the most common option. Naturally, the audit command language software is different from SQL server platform in a few ways. Firstly, SQL server outperforms software de auditoria ACL on projects with a large volume of data. This is a handy feature for an ‘audit analytics software’. Secondly, SQL server is capable of housing multiple projects, within the same environment. This is rather convenient for users to refer to older and ongoing projects for reference. Lastly, SQL server can be used to for development projects. This is a handy feature to implement automations using front-end tools like VBA or C#.
Audit Command Language Vs SQL Server – Pros for Audit Command Language
ACL analytics has its own unique place in the industry for good reason. Firstly, it is an audit data analytics software. This implies that audit professionals find it extremely easy to use. Given, the nature of the industry the return on investment is not a very difficult goal to achieve. Considering the features and price, it is an ideal auditing software for accountants. Lastly and certainly not the least, the design of the GUI is the biggest selling point. The tool is not used to develop software applications. This allows users to focus on building ACL programs and ACL scripts to for audit and enterprise risk projects. All this, by simply using the Graphical User Interface.